{"id":7966,"date":"2018-04-14T16:08:49","date_gmt":"2018-04-14T15:08:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/responsable-academia.org\/action\/guidelines\/commissions-enquete\/"},"modified":"2021-02-22T19:16:33","modified_gmt":"2021-02-22T18:16:33","slug":"investigative-commissions","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/methods\/guidelines\/investigative-commissions\/","title":{"rendered":"“Commissions of Inquiry”"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row padding_top=”25″ padding_bottom=”25″][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Referent<\/strong><\/span>: Pierre-Jean Benghozi<\/a><\/p>\n

Method<\/strong><\/span>: 2 days of training in Geneva. Group and remote case studies. Debate on acquired knowledge. Interaction with IRAFPA experts.<\/p>\n

Follow-up of the certification<\/strong><\/span>: Assistance in the implementation of the program. Confidential advice at the request of the certified people. Monitoring progress at the end of years 1 and 2. Annual anonymous document tracking shared by all certified persons. Verification of certification after 2 years.<\/p>\n

Skills acquired through certification<\/h3>\n

1) Register a complaint of fraud and\/or plagiarism<\/span><\/strong>
\nConduct a prompt and objective investigation to prevent complainants from feeling unfair and rumours from spreading.<\/p>\n

2) Set up an ad hoc committee<\/strong><\/span>
\nRefusing to entrust the investigation to an internal commission: pres- sure, lack of serenity, biased conclusions…<\/p>\n

3) Select Committee Members<\/strong><\/span>
\nComplementarity of members: a doctor in law, one or two specialists in the relevant field, an expert in fraud or plagiarism.<\/p>\n

4) Facts, facts, always facts<\/strong><\/span>
\nCollect case documents appropriately: distinguish reliable and factual documents (see certification 4) from emotionally overwhelming wri- tings.<\/p>\n

5) Qualify the fault(s)<\/strong><\/span>
\nEstablish the seriousness of the fraud or plagiarism: distinguish the extent of the intentionality of the perpetrator.<\/p>\n

6) Contextualize the case<\/strong><\/span>
\nThen conduct stakeholder hearings to contextualize the relationships between stakeholders, and identify associated responsibilities.<\/p>\n

7) Determining offending behaviour<\/strong><\/span>
\nDetermine the impact of fraudulent behaviour on collateral victims (e.g. publishers, readers, etc.)<\/p>\n

8) Establish potential remedies for stakeholders<\/strong><\/span>
\nFormulate specific recommendations for institutional leaders who will then have to act.<\/p>\n

9) Conclude the investigation<\/strong><\/span>
\nThe objective of the conclusion is the pacification of communities while restoring equity between individuals, actors and organizations.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

10) Communicate on the investigation<\/strong><\/span>
\nPrepare an annual summary of (anonymized) cases investigated: quantity and nature of sanctions. Communicate it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row padding_top=”25″ padding_bottom=”25″][vc_column][vc_column_text] Referent: Pierre-Jean Benghozi Method: 2 days of training in Geneva. Group and remote case studies. Debate on acquired knowledge. Interaction with IRAFPA experts. Follow-up of the certification: Assistance in the implementation of the program. Confidential advice at the request of the certified people. Monitoring progress at the end of years 1 and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":7337,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-7966","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7966\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1\/"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments\/?post=7966"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7966\/revisions\/"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10764,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7966\/revisions\/10764\/"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7337\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=7966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}