[vc_row padding_top=”25″ padding_bottom=”25″][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Referents<\/strong><\/span>: Martine Peters, Marian Popescu & Michelle Bergadaa\u0300<\/p>\n Method<\/strong><\/span> : 2 days of training in Geneva. Role-playing ; Group case studies (25 real cases) and remote case studies (Serious Games) ; Debate about the acquired knowledge and interaction . Interaction with IRAFPA experts.<\/p>\n Follow-up of the certification<\/strong><\/span>: Confidential advice at the request of certified peoples, self-training and remote validation of skills. Yearly validation of the certification each year by completion of a test case.<\/p>\n 1) \u00a0Understanding changes in the work context<\/span><\/strong> 2) \u00a0Existing ethical guidelines in Europe<\/strong><\/span> 3) \u00a0Recognize the different profiles of delinquency<\/strong><\/span> 4) \u00a0Reframing situations<\/strong><\/span> 5) \u00a0Mediation levers<\/strong><\/span> 6) \u00a0Structuring the central problem and dimension analysis<\/strong><\/span> 7) \u00a0Determine the consequences of the behaviour<\/strong><\/span> 8) \u00a0Identify the deep attitude of the parties<\/strong><\/span> 9) \u00a0Get out of shame and accusation<\/strong><\/span> 10) Develop the means to solve the situation<\/strong><\/span> [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [vc_row padding_top=”25″ padding_bottom=”25″][vc_column][vc_column_text] Referents: Martine Peters, Marian Popescu & Michelle Bergadaa\u0300 Method : 2 days of training in Geneva. Role-playing ; Group case studies (25 real cases) and remote case studies (Serious Games) ; Debate about the acquired knowledge and interaction . Interaction with IRAFPA experts. Follow-up of the certification: Confidential advice at the request […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":7337,"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-7969","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7969\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1\/"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments\/?post=7969"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7969\/revisions\/"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8426,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7969\/revisions\/8426\/"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7337\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/irafpa.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=7969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Skills acquired for certification<\/h3>\n
\nThe law of “publish or perish”, electronic communications, Open Science, roles of scientific journals…<\/p>\n
\nChanges (digital and globalization) have occurred rapidly and integrity guidelines are being developed. To know those already in force in Europe.<\/p>\n
\nFraudsters, manipulators, cheaters or “bricoleurs”: how to react to their characteristic behaviour (attack, denial, escape…).<\/p>\n
\nContextualize cases of plagiarism or scientific fraud involving complex conflict situations: doctoral students, professors, administrators, au- thors, co-authors, journals, etc.<\/p>\n
\nAcquire the basic knowledge to be a mediator: legal, organizational, political…<\/p>\n
\nMap the core concept, dimensions and observables, then identify case priorities (importance and urgency.)<\/p>\n
\nDetermine the impact of fraudulent behaviour on collateral victims: publishers, readers, colleagues, institution, etc.<\/p>\n
\nHave each party express what it wishes to become and do in order to define the framework of the mediation space.<\/p>\n
\nReframe the heart of the problem (plagiarism, changes in the order of authors, scientific fraud, etc.) to formulate specific requests.<\/p>\n
\nThe solution needs to be fair and balanced to be accepted and to pacify the situation (apology letter, addition of an author, withdrawal of an article…)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n